Field Reference / Module 05 · Performance / Performance Monitoring
Module 05

Performance Monitoring

Performance monitoring is the systematic tracking of key parameters over time to detect degradation before it becomes a safety event or a production problem. Thermal efficiency tells you where you are; performance monitoring tells you where you are heading.

The six core performance KPIs

These six parameters define heater health. Each is readable from the DCS or field instrumentation. Together they give a complete picture of combustion quality, process performance, and equipment condition. Values shown are representative typical targets.

Stack O2 (dry)
2-4 %
Target for most gas-fired heaters. Equivalent to 15-25% excess air.
CO in flue gas
<100 ppm
Alarm at 200 ppm. CO confirms incomplete combustion regardless of O2 reading.
Stack Temperature
150-350 C
Lower limit set by acid dewpoint (~120-150C). Rising trend = convection fouling.
Bridgewall Temp
750-900 C
Varies by heater design. Rising BWTemp at constant firing = radiant section issue.
COT Pass Spread
<10 C
Max spread between hottest and coolest pass. More than 15C requires investigation.
Thermal Efficiency
85-92 %
Trend matters more than absolute value. Track weekly at consistent conditions.
i
Trend vs. absolute value
A single reading in isolation is less useful than a reading in context. What matters is whether the value is drifting from its own established baseline - not whether it exceeds a generic threshold.

Stack temperature - reading the trend

Stack temperature is the most accessible indicator of heater performance. Every 20C rise above a clean-baseline costs approximately 1% in thermal efficiency. A heater that drifts from 250C to 310C over six months has lost roughly 3% efficiency.

Stack Temperature Trend - Illustrative 12-Week Fouling Pattern
Wk 1Wk 2Wk 3Wk 4Wk 5Wk 6Wk 7Wk 8Wk 9Wk 10Wk 11Wk 12
Stack Temperature - Condition Assessment
Temperature vs. BaselineConditionLikely CauseAction
Within plus/minus 10CNormalOperating at design conditionsContinue monitoring at scheduled frequency
+10 to +20CMonitor closelyEarly convection fouling; excess air increase; soot build-upIncrease check frequency; schedule sootblowing; verify stack O2
Greater than +20CAction requiredSignificant convection fouling; air ingress; refractory damageSootblow immediately; investigate air ingress; plan outage if trend continues
Sudden drop >30CInvestigateFiring rate reduction; draft change; partial flame loss; instrument faultCheck firing rate, flame condition, and analyser calibration

O2 and CO - reading combustion health together

Stack O2 and CO must always be read as a pair. Neither parameter alone gives the complete picture. The four diagnostic combinations below cover every combustion condition you are likely to encounter.

O2 ReadingCO ReadingCombustion StateOperator Action
2-4% O2 <100 ppm CO Optimal. Complete combustion at correct excess air. No action. Maintain and log.
>5% O2 <100 ppm CO Too much excess air. Combustion complete but stack heat loss elevated. Efficiency penalty. Trim air registers. Move in 0.5% O2 steps. Monitor CO after each adjustment.
<1% O2 >200 ppm CO Insufficient air. Incomplete combustion. Unburned fuel in flue gas - serious hazard. Increase air immediately. Open air registers. Check for burner blockage. Add air before reducing firing rate.
2-4% O2 >200 ppm CO Poor mixing. Total air adequate but distribution wrong. Burner or register fault. Inspect burners at peephole. Check register positions. Suspect damaged tip or blocked port.

Pass balance monitoring

Most process heaters have multiple parallel passes. Each should carry roughly equal flow and exit at the same coil outlet temperature (COT). When passes are out of balance, the hot pass has elevated tube metal temperatures - increasing tube failure risk. A spread greater than 10-15C between hottest and coolest pass is the threshold for investigation.

Pass A
352C
BALANCED
Pass B
349C
BALANCED
Pass C
374C
HIGH - INVESTIGATE
Pass D
338C
LOW - CHECK FLOW
!
High COT spread - never reduce firing as the sole response
Reducing firing rate lowers all COTs but does not fix the flow imbalance. The hot pass still has disproportionate heat flux relative to its flow. Investigate the cause of the imbalance first.

Recognising fouling progression

Internal tube fouling (coking) and external convection fouling (soot, scale) both reduce heat transfer and force higher firing rates to hold COT. Early indicators appear in the DCS well before the situation becomes critical.

Stage 1 - Early
Subtle drift
Stack temp +5-15C above baseline. Fuel rate slowly creeping up to hold COT. Pass balance within limits. No alarms active.
Stage 2 - Mid
Clear trend
Stack temp +15-30C. Noticeably increased firing rate. Pass spread widening. Efficiency calculation showing 2-4% loss. Sootblowing becoming more frequent.
Stage 3 - Late
Requires action
Stack temp greater than +30C. Near firing rate limit. Pass imbalance greater than 15C. Efficiency below 80%. Decoking or outage now required.

What to check and when

Every round
(2-4 hrs)
Stack O2CO (if analyser fitted)COT per passFirebox draftPeephole flame checkFuel pressure / flow
Each shift
Stack temperatureBridgewall temperaturePass flow balanceTube metal temps (TMT)Process inlet flowLog all readings
Weekly
Thermal efficiency estimateStack temp trend vs. baselineFuel consumption vs. dutyConvection section delta-T checkAnalyser calibration verify
Monthly
Full calorimetric efficiency calculationFouling index trendEngineering review of trendsNOx / SO2 emissions check (permit)

Quick efficiency estimate - the field method

A simplified stack loss method using only stack temperature and O2 gives an estimate accurate to plus or minus 2-3% for daily trend tracking.

Stack Loss Method - Simplified (Gas Fuel)
Stack Loss % = (T_stack - T_ambient) x K
K factor based on stack O2 (dry):
  O2 = 2% K = 0.028
  O2 = 3% K = 0.031
  O2 = 5% K = 0.037
  O2 = 7% K = 0.044

Thermal Efficiency = 100% - Stack Loss% - 3% (radiation / convection assumed)

Example: T_stack = 280C, T_ambient = 20C, O2 = 3%
Stack Loss = 260 x 0.031 = 8.1% Efficiency = 88.9%

Trusting your instruments - and knowing when not to

Fired heater instruments operate in a harsh environment and will drift or fail. A reading that contradicts two other instruments is usually the wrong one.

Common Instrument Faults - Recognition and Response
InstrumentCommon FaultHow to Spot ItResponse
Stack O2 analyser Cell degradation; sample line blockage; air ingress at probe O2 high while flame looks rich; reading unresponsive to air register changes Cross-check with portable analyser. Blocked sample line typically reads high.
Thermocouple (COT / stack) Drift high (oxidised junction); open circuit Diverging from adjacent TCs; sudden jump to full scale or zero Cross-check with adjacent TC. Replace if open circuit.
Firebox pressure (draft) Impulse line blocked with soot or condensate Reading stuck at one value; unresponsive to damper changes Purge impulse line. Cross-check with portable manometer at peephole port.
Tube metal temp (IR / TC) View port fouling (IR pyrometer); TC pullout Uniformly low readings; reading lower than COT (physically impossible) Clean view port. Verify TC seating. Do not dismiss low TMT readings.

Summary

Three habits define effective performance monitoring: read O2 and CO together at every round; trend stack temperature and efficiency weekly with the numbers written down; treat any instrument reading that contradicts the others as suspicious until confirmed. The log is the tool. The trend is the story.

Every-shift monitoring checklist
Stack O2 in target band (2-4%) · CO below 100 ppm · Stack temp compared to last reading · COT on all passes within 10C spread · Bridgewall temp steady · Flame appearance consistent at peephole · All readings logged.